Generasia would not be possible without tokyograph and all the wonderful people who've contributed over the past 15 years. Thank you!
Difference between revisions of "Talk:2009 Oricon Top 200 Singles"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
If the Oricon year ended on 12/14, shouldn't the final numbers be the ones from post #138 [http://jbbs.livedoor.jp/bbs/read.cgi/music/3914/1230959531/ here], instead of the ones from post #131 on 12/08? --[[User:Lambchopsuey|Lambchopsuey]] 22:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC) | If the Oricon year ended on 12/14, shouldn't the final numbers be the ones from post #138 [http://jbbs.livedoor.jp/bbs/read.cgi/music/3914/1230959531/ here], instead of the ones from post #131 on 12/08? --[[User:Lambchopsuey|Lambchopsuey]] 22:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC) | ||
| − | :So 2009 Oricon ends at 12/21, not 12/14 like I always thought (so 2009 took 53 weeks, not 52). Thank you for pointing the mistake, I just check the rank at [http://www.oricon.co.jp/rank/js/y/ Oricon website] and it's like you said. I will edit it soon (now I'm having my breakfast of 2010 XD) --[[User:Seph|Seph]] 01:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC) | + | :So 2009 Oricon ends at 12/21, not 12/14 like I always thought (so 2009 took 53 weeks, not 52). Thank you for pointing the mistake, I just check the rank at [http://www.oricon.co.jp/rank/js/y/ Oricon website] and it's like you said. I will edit it soon (now I'm having my first breakfast of 2010 XD) --[[User:Seph|Seph]] 01:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC) |
Latest revision as of 01:49, 1 January 2010
If the Oricon year ended on 12/14, shouldn't the final numbers be the ones from post #138 here, instead of the ones from post #131 on 12/08? --Lambchopsuey 22:27, 31 December 2009 (UTC)
- So 2009 Oricon ends at 12/21, not 12/14 like I always thought (so 2009 took 53 weeks, not 52). Thank you for pointing the mistake, I just check the rank at Oricon website and it's like you said. I will edit it soon (now I'm having my first breakfast of 2010 XD) --Seph 01:49, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
