Generasia would not be possible without tokyograph and all the wonderful people who've contributed over the past 15 years. Thank you!
Difference between revisions of "Category talk:English Fluent"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I have a small issue with the phrase "People found in this category are not native speakers" - this isn't true for a lot of them, and for some of them, they were raised speaking English. Some of them were raised with both English and Japanese and therefore don't technically have a "native" language. Shouldn't that part be removed, or revised to say "Some people found in this category are not necessarily native speakers"? ~ [[User:Wapiko|Wapiko]] 18:48, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | I have a small issue with the phrase "People found in this category are not native speakers" - this isn't true for a lot of them, and for some of them, they were raised speaking English. Some of them were raised with both English and Japanese and therefore don't technically have a "native" language. Shouldn't that part be removed, or revised to say "Some people found in this category are not necessarily native speakers"? ~ [[User:Wapiko|Wapiko]] 18:48, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
: I'm not too sure on how to phrase it. That was the only way I could think of xD; I don't think that revised statement works though. ~ [[User:Themonkeyofdoom|Themonkeyofdoom]] 19:14, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | : I'm not too sure on how to phrase it. That was the only way I could think of xD; I don't think that revised statement works though. ~ [[User:Themonkeyofdoom|Themonkeyofdoom]] 19:14, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
| + | :: Yeah, I wasn't sure how to phrase my revision. xDDD Maybe we could just take it out, period? It's not like English is a major language here at this wiki, so we don't need categories like Japanese or Korean Fluent...so just, English Fluent? If that makes sense. xD ~ [[User:Wapiko|Wapiko]] 19:54, 24 April 2010 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 00:54, 25 April 2010
I have a small issue with the phrase "People found in this category are not native speakers" - this isn't true for a lot of them, and for some of them, they were raised speaking English. Some of them were raised with both English and Japanese and therefore don't technically have a "native" language. Shouldn't that part be removed, or revised to say "Some people found in this category are not necessarily native speakers"? ~ Wapiko 18:48, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- I'm not too sure on how to phrase it. That was the only way I could think of xD; I don't think that revised statement works though. ~ Themonkeyofdoom 19:14, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
- Yeah, I wasn't sure how to phrase my revision. xDDD Maybe we could just take it out, period? It's not like English is a major language here at this wiki, so we don't need categories like Japanese or Korean Fluent...so just, English Fluent? If that makes sense. xD ~ Wapiko 19:54, 24 April 2010 (CDT)
