Generasia would not be possible without tokyograph and all the wonderful people who've contributed over the past 15 years. Thank you!
Difference between revisions of "Talk:Asa ga Kuru"
m |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Why is the song info first? We always put the single info first, even if it's a remixed/different version, and then the song information plus the disambiguation for the different versions...--[[User:Pizca|Pizca]] 16:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | Why is the song info first? We always put the single info first, even if it's a remixed/different version, and then the song information plus the disambiguation for the different versions...--[[User:Pizca|Pizca]] 16:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
: I thought I had seen some other pages this way. Back on thePPN there was a page for [[Hamasaki Ayumi]]'s "[[Connected]]" and it featured the song information, then all of the different remix singles and the page looked really nice, so that example always sticks out in my head ^^; If were doing the releases chronologically, then the original song should be first since it's not just a re-cut, then the remixed single information. ~ [[User:Themonkeyofdoom|Themonkeyofdoom]] 21:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | : I thought I had seen some other pages this way. Back on thePPN there was a page for [[Hamasaki Ayumi]]'s "[[Connected]]" and it featured the song information, then all of the different remix singles and the page looked really nice, so that example always sticks out in my head ^^; If were doing the releases chronologically, then the original song should be first since it's not just a re-cut, then the remixed single information. ~ [[User:Themonkeyofdoom|Themonkeyofdoom]] 21:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::I don't know, I don't think the page looks good like this, but on top of that since we are going for a total consistency on the pages format, I think it should be like the rest of them (or majority? I haven't seen others like that). Personally I always thought that a page looks better when the "bigger" release is on top, because all the info that is on top now can fit perfectly at the bottom of a regular Single page. I mean, the song is a remix but it's a single, and singles have their own pages. What if [[YUKI]] would be released an album with the same name, then this page would have the title "Asa ga Kuru (song)" or "Asa ga Kuru (single)? It can't be "song" since there's a single information in there. | ||
| + | ::That was too long, sorry XD --[[User:Pizca|Pizca]] 22:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:45, 7 April 2010
Why is the song info first? We always put the single info first, even if it's a remixed/different version, and then the song information plus the disambiguation for the different versions...--Pizca 16:03, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- I thought I had seen some other pages this way. Back on thePPN there was a page for Hamasaki Ayumi's "Connected" and it featured the song information, then all of the different remix singles and the page looked really nice, so that example always sticks out in my head ^^; If were doing the releases chronologically, then the original song should be first since it's not just a re-cut, then the remixed single information. ~ Themonkeyofdoom 21:36, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
- I don't know, I don't think the page looks good like this, but on top of that since we are going for a total consistency on the pages format, I think it should be like the rest of them (or majority? I haven't seen others like that). Personally I always thought that a page looks better when the "bigger" release is on top, because all the info that is on top now can fit perfectly at the bottom of a regular Single page. I mean, the song is a remix but it's a single, and singles have their own pages. What if YUKI would be released an album with the same name, then this page would have the title "Asa ga Kuru (song)" or "Asa ga Kuru (single)? It can't be "song" since there's a single information in there.
- That was too long, sorry XD --Pizca 22:45, 7 April 2010 (UTC)
